The Laws of the Universe

 

This is a sermon that I wrote and delivered to the All Souls Welcoming Congregation of Kernersville, North Carolina, on December 8, 1996.

 

I.  Introduction

 

What are the Laws of the Universe?  Many cultures have attempted to answer this question in order to bring predictability and order to a chaotic world.  In our relationships with the physical world, in our relationship with each other, we seek a firm foundation upon which we can stand: a place where we can understand the past, know the present, and plan for the future.

 

In my sermon today, I hope to provide you with some ideas to get you started or to help you continue on your personal search for laws and order in the Universe.  I will provide questions, but few answers, for I believe every person needs to develop their own answers as they develop their own personal theology.  However, I hope that after the sermon you will participate in a discussion where we offer our individual points of view on these questions.

 

 

II.  The Greek Philosophers

 

The ancient Greek philosophers, I am told, were the first to assume that the universe was, despite its chaotic appearance, at heart an orderly system that was governed by universal laws, and that man could discover these laws through the process of logical thought and observation.  They asked the questions:

 

                What is everything made of?  What permanent substance or substances exist behind appearances?  (Assuming the universe is orderly, is there a unifying physical substance upon which the different objects of our world are based?)  What is Reality?

 

                How does the universe change?  (In a world where few things seem permanent, how do things come into being, change, and then pass away?)  How can I know what will happen tomorrow?

 

And these questions lead to more questions:

 

                Is change random, or is it directed?  And, if it is directed, who is in control of change?  Gods, or Man?  Can I control my future?  One of our congregation's members has suggested to me that "Fate doesn't exist, but choices can be limited."

 

                What is the purpose of Man on earth?  What is the Meaning of Life?

 

 

III.  Rules governing relationships

 

As I was thinking about ways to better get a handle on the above questions, it occurred to me that it is useful to think about how things in the universe relate to one another: how they affect each other, and what responsibilities such a relationship entails.  If we divide the things in the universe into things that are human and things that are not human, we come up with the following four possible relationships:  the physical, the social, what we expect from the universe, and what believe we should give to the universe.

 

A.            Physical Relationships:  The rules that govern the substance of the universe

 

                Here we're dealing with physical laws and forces such as gravity, fusion, inertia, and the interchangeability of energy and matter.  We'll be speaking more on this a bit later.  But for now, I'd like to share with you a view from anthropologist Loren Eiseley, who says that there may be something more to the physical world than just matter and energy:

 

"Men talk much of matter and energy, of the struggle for existence that molds the shape of life.  These things exist, it is true; but more delicate, elusive, quicker than the fins in water, is that mysterious principle known as "organization", which leaves all other mysteries concerned with life stale and insignificant by comparison.  For that without organization life does not persist is obvious.  Yet this organization itself is not strictly the product of life, nor of selection.  Like some dark and passing shadow within matter, it cups out the eyes' small windows or spaces the notes of a meadow lark's song in the interior of a mottled egg.  That principle - I am beginning to suspect - was there before the living in the deeps of water."

 

B.            Social Relationships:  Man's relationship to his fellow Man

 

                In dealing with each other, how should we proceed?  Do we choose to compete or cooperate?  Do we follow the way of the predator, or is symbiosis the better strategy?  Do we make war, or make love?  I'm reminded here of our Unitarian Universalist Principles, which affirm and promote:

 

"The inherent dignity and worth of every person;

Justice, equity and compassion in human relations;

A free and responsible search for truth and meaning;

      and   The goal of world community with peace, liberty, and justice for all."

 

and also of Unitarian Universalist theologian David Rankin's statement:

 

"We believe in the worth and dignity of each human being.  All people on earth have an equal claim to life, liberty, and justice - and no idea, ideal, or philosophy is superior to a single human life."

 

C.            What we expect from the universe: The Environment's relationship to Mankind

 

                What is it that we expect from the universe?  It is a hostile place, or a benevolent place?  Is it indifferent to life, or is it life-spawning and life-nourishing?  Is there a supportive life force that pervades the universe?

 

D.            What we should give to the universe:  Man's relationship to his Environment

 

                How do we treat the animals, plants, and natural resources that are vulnerable to Man's ability to exploit and alter the environment?  Again I am reminded of our Unitarian Universalist Principles, which call on us to maintain respect for "the interdependent web of all existence of which we are a part".

 

 

IV.  The Physical Laws of the Universe

 

Today's service was originally inspired by a newspaper column that appeared about a month ago in a local paper.  The column, "You Can U, with Beakman and Jax" is modeled after the "Beakman's World" TV show, and is designed to provide answers to children's questions about science, but does so in an uninhibited and original way that frequently brings up even more questions.  Such was the case with this instance of the column, in which a reader asked, "What are the laws of the Universe?"  The column's author, Jok Church, responded with four laws.  I think these laws have an elegance that allows us to interpret them not only as physical laws, but also as philosophical principles that can apply to our own lives.

 

1.             The Universe Likes Balance

 

The authors illustrated this law with a Yin-Yang symbol, and stated that "Balance is needed for there to be matter.  If an atom wasn't balanced, it couldn't exist.  The forces of nature will push tirelessly and forever to make things balanced."

 

                In other words, the universe is always seeking equilibrium.  One effect of this that I can see is that even though we may appear to ourselves to be stable and secure where we are, if we are out of balance with our world, then there is a pull on us that is trying to re-establish balance, and we are continually expending energy if we try to resist the pull.

 

2.             Nothing Ever Disappears

 

"There is only so much stuff in the universe.  None of it disappears, ever.  When things seem to disappear, they've really only changed their form."

 

                Here the author is talking about the interchangeability of matter and energy, but I wonder if we can use their statement as a springboard to think about other things.  What about life?  What about love?  Do these forces, fragile one moment, strong the next, have a similar place in the universe?  Do they seem to disappear, only to reappear somewhere else in a different form?

 

3.             There is no Darkness, only Light

 

"Negative things like darkness or cold are not really things at all.  They're the absence of things.  There is only more or less light.  There is only more or less heat.  To make dark, you must block the light.  To make cold, you must remove the heat.  Energy will move into cold or dark spaces until all of the space shares equal light, equal heat.  See Law #1."

 

                Although shadows such as darkness or cold are physical absences rather than presences, we are able to perceive them by contrasting them to their real opposites.  And these shadows are, in fact, necessary for us to be able to perceive their opposites.  Imagine a world that was evenly filled with total light; it would be as useless to us as a totally dark world; our perception would be flooded and useless.  As the Greek philosopher Heraclitus wrote in 500 B.C.:

 

"It is not good for men to get all they wish to get.  It is sickness that makes health pleasant; evil, good; hunger, plenty; weariness, rest."

 

                So, in our world of perception, the absence of things must always be present, and in that sense, the absences become realities to us, part of the eternal pair-bond between light and shadow.

 

D.            There are Different Truths

 

"Energy can be a wave... A whole set of laws of Nature flow from [that view].  But energy can also seem to be a ... particle.  ... And whole new laws flow from [that] view...  Both views are way different.  Both are completely true.  They are different truths."

 

                Different perspectives on the universe may provide us with different rules for the same reality; it all depends on our viewpoint.  As David Rankin says:

 

"We believe in the never-ending search for Truth...All religions, in every age and culture, possess not only an intrinsic merit, but also a potential value for those who have learned the art of listening...If the mind and heart are truly free and open, the revelations which appear to the human spirit are infinitely numerous, eternally fruitful, and wondrously exciting."

 

V.  Discussion

 

"Different perspectives on the universe may provide us with different rules for the same reality; it all depends on our viewpoint."  I invite your viewpoints and perspectives!